Personality, values, culture: an evolutionary approach
In: Culture and psychology
55 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Culture and psychology
In: Transcultural psychiatry, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 352-355
ISSN: 1461-7471
In: Justice and Conflicts, S. 345-358
In: International journal of cross cultural management, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 25-49
ISSN: 1741-2838
Culture is often seen as a shared meaning system. This definition has important implications for cross cultural management research. This article outlines a multilevel research process model that identifies a number of crucial steps to be aware of, if culture is being treated as a shared construct. The model integrates recent advances on composition models in organizational research and equivalence and multilevel frameworks in cross cultural psychology research. The proposed model is discussed in relation to two principal areas of cross cultural management work: (a) the identification of cultural constructs at the country level and (b) individual-level studies aiming to unpackage cultural differences in attitudes and behaviour. Implications for management research and practice across cultures are discussed.
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 148, Heft 2, S. 167-186
ISSN: 1940-1183
In: Economica, Band 59, Heft 234, S. 221
In: Journal of development economics, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 555-579
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: Journal of international economics, Band 32, Heft 1-2, S. 149-163
ISSN: 0022-1996
In: Peace and conflict: journal of peace psychology ; the journal of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence, Peace Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 227-248
ISSN: 1532-7949
In: The journal of policy reform, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 105-125
ISSN: 1477-2736
In: Journal of international economics, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 377-400
ISSN: 0022-1996
In: Measurement instruments for the social sciences, S. 1-16
ISSN: 2523-8930
The current study aimed to replicate the development of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in a sample of 399 undergraduate students. We factor analyzed the Mindful Attention and Awareness Questionnaire (MAAS), the Freiburg Mindfulness Scale, the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ), the Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale Revised (CAMS-R), and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS), but also extended the analysis by including a conceptually related measure, the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS), and a conceptually unrelated measure, the Langer Mindfulness Scale (LMS). Overall, we found a partial replication of the five-factor structure, with the exception of non-reacting and non-judging which formed a single factor. The PHLMS items loaded as expected with theoretically related factors, whereas the LMS items emerged as separate factor. Finally, we found a new factor that was mostly defined by negatively worded items indicating possible item wording artifacts within the FFMQ. Our conceptual validation study indicates that some facets of the FFMQ can be recovered, but item wording factors may threaten the stability of these facets. Additionally, measures such as the LMS appear to measure not only theoretically, but also empirically different constructs.